School security, chronic dilemma

State developing threat guide
Tuesday, February 14, 2006 • BY JOHN MOONEY • Star-Ledger Staff

It usually starts with a phone call to the school, warning of the unthinkable: a bomb in the building.

Sometimes, a nervous or giggling voice on the phone gives it away as a prank, just another kid who wants to disrupt school. Other times, the details about the supposed bomb's location or just the tone on the other end of the line sound chillingly real.

Either way, the school's administration must act fast.

"You come to see them as more a disruption than as a threat, but you can't ignore them," said Montclair High School Principal Mel Katz. "And that's why they are so effective. You don't want to be the one principal who didn't act."

How school administrators respond to the scores of bomb threats against New Jersey public schools each year has proven a point of debate lately. Although the vast majority of calls turn out to be hoaxes, not a single administrator wants to be idle witness to the exception.

Evacuations themselves can bring their own problems as they have in Middletown and Montclair recently.

There is no one answer on how to solve the problem, and certainly not an easy one, officials said. As part of a statewide review of security procedures in virtually every school, state officials plan to put out new guidelines to help districts handle bomb scares and other potential security threats.

But the state guidelines will only be recommendations.

"Each place is so unique, so complex, that they need to tailor their plans with their local law enforcement to match their specific situations," said Dennis Quinn, an assistant to the state attorney general who has overseen the school security review.

There are no hard numbers available as to whether school bomb scares are on the rise in the state. In the most recent statewide data available, there were 134 threats in 2002-2003 and 116 in 2003-2004.

Such data is notoriously underreported, officials said, but the number of bomb scares appears well short of the peak following the Columbine High School shootings in April 1999.

Typically, bomb scares occur at high schools, and students make the calls. If caught, a student faces long-term suspension and charges of criminal mischief and creating a false public alarm.

But bomb scares are also known to come in spurts. There have been at least a dozen threats since the fall in Middletown, where frustration came to a head last month. A threat was received at Middletown High School North during a rain storm, and 1,700 students were shepherded outside in the cold to wait for the school to be checked.

At least 100 of the students did not return to class. Upon return to school, they were handed five-day suspensions for disobeying procedures, prompting further complaints and putting administrators on the defensive.

"We have to make sure that everyone follows the plan," said Assistant Superintendent Christopher Halpin, who made the final call on the suspensions. "That's our burden, to make sure that every child is accounted for ... No matter how many times it has happened before, you can't assume this one won't count."

He conceded it is a tough task managing so many students in such a situation, and he and his staff are now fine-tuning the plan to at least make shelter available to students who aren't well. Nevertheless, Halpin said he won't think twice about evacuating again.

"We're not the experts on what's a credible threat or not," he said. "The bottom line is if we are going to protect them from something that could cause them harm, they may have to stand in the rain."

Montclair High School had its own evacuation glitch last month, when a group of students also skipped school after being herded onto the nearby football field.

Eleven were suspended for a day, and 30 more received after-school or Saturday detention, school officials said.

But the school maybe sent its most powerful message to the student body by tracing the caller that same day. The caller was a friend of a student. He was arrested and held on $50,000 bond on charges of making a false public alarm.

"The biggest deterrence we have is quick apprehension," said principal Katz.

In a statewide security review of every school last year, prompted by the terrorist massacre at a school in Beslan, Russia, in 2004, state officials learned that there were not uniform policies for dealing with bomb scares and other potential threats.

But law enforcement officials said they are reluctant to apply a hard and fast rule on evacuations.

"State Police will not say whether to evacuate or not," said Quinn, of the attorney general's office. "Even if you are getting a lot of the crank calls, it remains your own decision."

It is hardly clearer in other states, although experts say schools are getting better at weeding out the obvious hoaxes.

"The majority of schools we have worked with around the nation do not automatically evacuate on bomb threat calls," said Kenneth Trump, a nationally recognized consultant on school security as president of National School Safety and Security Services in Cleveland.

"The common practice is make a report to law enforcement and then evaluate the facts of each incident on a case-by-case basis," he said. "The very general rule of thumb is that the more details and specificity in the threat, the more credible it is perceived to be."

Some law enforcement officials in the state agree that not every threat may warrant a full evacuation, especially if among a spate of calls.

But Woodbridge Police Lt. Thomas Gennarelli, whose force has responded to at least three bomb scares at Colonia High School this year, said he would never tell a superintendent not to take every precaution he or she felt necessary.

After all, with one of Colonia's last bomb threats, the lieutenant said the school wasn't the only place to be checked for danger.

"They evacuated the kids to the bleachers, and we had to sweep that, too," he said. "Just to be safe."


John Mooney covers education. He may be reached at jmooney@starledger.com or (973) 392-1548.
© 2006 The Star-Ledger. Used by NJ.com with permission.

Return to Articles page